以纸片法筛查儿童铅毒性易感性的方法学研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R595.2

基金项目:


Screening the Susceptibility to Childhood Lead Poisoning by the Filter Paper Method
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:建立以纸片末梢血筛查儿童铅毒性易感性的方法。方法:以Chelex 100 为介质及氯仿法抽提基因组DNA,并比较二者的DNA得率。PCR扩增σ-aminolevulinate dehydratase(ALAD)基因片段,以限制性内切酶MspⅠ分析ALAD基因型。结果:以Chelex 100 为介质抽提基因组DNA的得率为 17.1 μg/ml,氯仿法抽提基因组DNA的得率为 17.5 μg/ml,两种之间的差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。以两种方法提取的DNA为模板扩增ALAD基因片段及进行ALAD基因型分析均具有较高的特异性,但以Chelex 100 为介质抽提基因组DNA扩增时敏感性有所降低。结论:以纸片末梢血分析ALAD基因型的方法来筛查儿童铅毒性作用的易感人群在技术上是可行的。

    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To establish the method of screening the susceptibility to childhood lead poisoning by filter paper. METHODS: The genomic DNA from normal children was extracted with Chelex 100 (the filter paper method) and the chloroform method. The quantity of DNA recovered by the two methods were compared. A rapid PCR based method for precise σ aminolevulinate dehydratase (ALAD) genotyping was also established. RESULTS: The quantity of DNA recovered by the filter paper method (with Chelex 100) and the chloroform method was 17.1 μg/ml and 17.5 μg/ml , respectively. There was no difference between the two methods. Both the two methods were of great practical value in the screening of ALAD genotype in high risk people, but the filter paper method was less sensitive for PCR amplification than the chloroform method.CONCLUSIONS:Technically the filter paper method might be more reliable in screening the susceptibility to childhood lead poisoning.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴胜虎, 颜崇淮, 沈晓明, 张燕萍, 余晓刚.以纸片法筛查儿童铅毒性易感性的方法学研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2002,4(5):351-353

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2002-05-25
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
ICP:湘ICP备17021739号-4
中国当代儿科杂志 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
管理员登录